Getting Research Evidence into Policy:
The Need for Strengthening Linkages and Partnership between Health Policy Makers and Researchers in the Health Sectors of Developing countries
References
M, Zwi AB, Rychetnik L. Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2009; 6: 21
Research Policy and Systems, 2009; 7: S3
Alabi GA. Case study: Effectiveness of informatics PolicyinstrumentsinAfrica. Nigeria Economic commission for Africa (ECA), 1994. Available at http://www.uneca.org/aisi/nigeria.htm
Akande JO, Jegede PO. Andragogy and computer literacy. The Nigeria perspective. The African Symposium, 2004; 4: 2
Gething PW, Noor AM, Gikandi PW, Ogara E et al. Improving imperfect data from health management information systems in Africa using space-time geostatistics. PLoS Medicine, 2006; 3: e271
Livny E, Mchendale A, Vanags A. Bridging the research policy gaps in developing and transition countries: analytical lessons and proposal for action. A synthesis of findings from the Global Development Network's Bridging Research and Policy Project (online). Available at http://www.ebpdn.org/resource/resour ce.php?lang=cs&id=691
Dobrow MJ, Goel V, Upshur REG. Evidence-based health policy context and utilisation. Social Sciences and Medicine, 2004; 58: 207-217
Uneke CJ, Ezeoha A, Ndukwe CD, Oyibo PG, Onwe F. Health Systems Research and Policy Development in Nigeria: the challenges and way forward. The Internet Journal of World Health and Societal Politics, 2009;6: 2
Choi BCK, Pang T, Lin V, Puska P et al. Can scientists and policy makers work together? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2005;58 (8): 632-637
LavisJN,OxmanAD,LewinS,Fretheim A. Support tools for evidence informed health policy making (STP) 3: setting priorities for supporting evidence informed policy making. Health
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The data collected from registered and non-registered users of this journal falls within the scope of the standard functioning of peer-reviewed journals. It includes information that makes communication possible for the editorial process; it is used to informs readers about the authorship and editing of content; it enables collecting aggregated data on readership behaviors, as well as tracking geopolitical and social elements of scholarly communication.
This journal’s editorial team uses this data to guide its work in publishing and improving this journal. Data that will assist in developing this publishing platform may be shared with its developer Public Knowledge Project in an anonymized and aggregated form, with appropriate exceptions such as article metrics. The data will not be sold by this journal or PKP nor will it be used for purposes other than those stated here. The authors published in this journal are responsible for the human subject data that figures in the research reported here.
Those involved in editing this journal seek to be compliant with industry standards for data privacy, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provision for “data subject rights” that include (a) breach notification; (b) right of access; (c) the right to be forgotten; (d) data portability; and (e) privacy by design. The GDPR also allows for the recognition of “the public interest in the availability of the data,” which has a particular saliency for those involved in maintaining, with the greatest integrity possible, the public record of scholarly publishing.
