The Public Health Impact of the Nigerian Abortion Policy and the Case for the Reform of the Nation's Abortion Laws
Abstract
.
References
Omo-Aghoja LO, Omo-Aghoja VW, Feyi-Waboso p, Onowhakpor A. The story of abortion: issues, controversies and a case for the review of the Nigeria national abortion laws. East African Journal of Public Health, 2010; Vol. 7 (4): 333-341.
CriminalCodeAct.Cap77Lawsofthe Federation 1990: 3213-3214.
Penal Code (Northern States) Federal Provisions Act. The laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990.
OkonofuaFE.Thecontributionofanti- abortion laws to maternal mortality in developing countries. Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008. Vol. 3, No. 2, 147-149. DOI: 10.1586/17474108.3.2.149.
Berer M. National laws and unsafe abortion: the parameters of change. Reprod Health Matters 2004; 12: 1-8.
David HP. Abortion in Europe, 1920- 1991: a public health perspective. Stud Fam Plann 1992; 23: 1-22.
Boonstra H, Gold R, Richard C, Finer P. Abortion in Women's lives. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/200 6/05/04/AiWL.pdf.
Jewkes R, Rees H, Dickson K, Brown H, Levin J. The impact of age on the epidemiology of incomplete abortions in South Africa after legislative change. BJOG 2005; 112: 355-359.
Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). Sharing Responsibilities: Women, Society and Abortion Worldwide. New York: AGI; 1991.
Grimmes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, Okonofua FE et al. Unsafe abortion: The preventable pandemic. The Lancet Special Issue on Women's Reproductive Health series, edited by Glasier, and Gulmezolu, Oct 2006; 65-76.
United Nations. Abortion policies: a global review. Vol III: Oman to Zimbabwe. New York: United Nations, Population Division, 2002.
Hirve SS. Abortion law, policy and services in India: a critical review. Reprod Health Matters 2004; 12: 114- 121.
Ganatra B. unsafe abortion in South and South-East Asia: a review of the evidence. In: Warriner IK, Shah IH (eds). Preventing unsafe abortion and its consequences: priorities for research and action. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2006: 151-186.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The data collected from registered and non-registered users of this journal falls within the scope of the standard functioning of peer-reviewed journals. It includes information that makes communication possible for the editorial process; it is used to informs readers about the authorship and editing of content; it enables collecting aggregated data on readership behaviors, as well as tracking geopolitical and social elements of scholarly communication.
This journal’s editorial team uses this data to guide its work in publishing and improving this journal. Data that will assist in developing this publishing platform may be shared with its developer Public Knowledge Project in an anonymized and aggregated form, with appropriate exceptions such as article metrics. The data will not be sold by this journal or PKP nor will it be used for purposes other than those stated here. The authors published in this journal are responsible for the human subject data that figures in the research reported here.
Those involved in editing this journal seek to be compliant with industry standards for data privacy, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provision for “data subject rights” that include (a) breach notification; (b) right of access; (c) the right to be forgotten; (d) data portability; and (e) privacy by design. The GDPR also allows for the recognition of “the public interest in the availability of the data,” which has a particular saliency for those involved in maintaining, with the greatest integrity possible, the public record of scholarly publishing.
