Morbidity Associated with Vaginal and Abdominal Hysterectomy in a Northern Nigerian Hospital


  • Dr Nwobodo Emmanuel I. Author
  • Oyetunji Jaiyeola A Author


Vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy, morbidity


Background: hysterectomy is one of the most common surgeries performed in gynaecological practice. It can be carried out either by vaginal or abdominal route. We compared the complications associated with the two types of surgeries.

Methods: A retrospective study involving all patients that had vaginal and total abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions between January 2002 and December 2009 (8 years) at the Federal Medical Centre Birnin- Kebbi, Kebbi State, Nigeria

Results: During the period,493 major gynecological operations were performed in the health centre with vaginal and total abdominal hysterectomy constituting 48 (9.7%) and 69 (14.0%) of the surgeries respectively. The only indication for the former was uterine prolapse while the main indication for the latter was uterine fibroid (82.6%). Excessive primary haemorrhage was statistically significantly higher in vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy (45.8% versus 17.4%; p-value <0.05). Other complications did not yield any statistically significant difference : bladder injury (8.3% versus 3.0%), bowel injury (0% versus 3%), ureteric injury (0% versus 1.4%), wound infection (4.2% versus 8.7%) and maternal death (2.1% versus 3.0%). The average duration of hospital stay in vaginal hysterectomy was 4.2 ± 0.6 days compared to 7.8 ±1.2 days in the abdominal procedure (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Excessive primary haemorrhage was significantly commoner in vaginal hysterectomy compared to its abdominal counterpart, however, other complications were not. Furthermore, the former had the advantage of shorter duration of hospital stay compared to the latter.

Author Biography

  • Dr Nwobodo Emmanuel I.

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital

    PMB 2370

    Sokoto, Nigeria

    Tel: 08036000379


Easterday CL, Grimes DA, Riggs GA. Hysterectomy in United States. Obstet. Gynaecol 1983; 62 : 203-12.

Arowojolu AO. Hysterectomy. In : Okonofua FE and Odunsi K (ed.s)Contemporary Obstetrics & GynaecologyforDeveloping Countries, Women’s Health & Action Research Centre, 2003 :227-42.

Dicker RC, Spellman JR, Summit RL. Out patient vaginal hysterectomy as a new trend in gynaecology. Bri J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 62 : 810-4.

Khan A. Why not vaginal route for hysterectomy? Pak J Gynaecol 1997; 10 : 11-7.

Juha M, Jari J, Candido T, Eija T, Pentti KH et al. Morbidity of 10,110 hysterectomies by type of approach. HumanRep2001; 16(7):1-14.

Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT, et al. Complications of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 144:841-8.

Umeora OUJ, Onoh RC, Eze JN, Igberase. Abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy : appraisal of indications and complications in a Nigerian Federal Medical Centre. Nepal J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 4(1) : 1-4.

Dorsey JA, Steinberg EP, Holtz PM. Clinicl indications for hysterectomy route; patient characteristics or physician preference? Amer J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 173 : 1452- 60.

Kayastha S, Tuladhar H. Vaginal versus

abdominal hysterectomy. Nepal Med College J 2006; 8 (4) : 259-62.

Benassi L, Rossi T, Ricci L, Bedocchi L, Galanti B, Vadora E. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri : a randomized clinical trial. Am J. Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 187 (6) :1561-5.

Singh, Bansal S. Comparative study of morbidity and mortality associated with non- descent vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy based on ultrasonographic determination of uterine volume. Int Surg 2008; 93(2) :88-94.




How to Cite

Morbidity Associated with Vaginal and Abdominal Hysterectomy in a Northern Nigerian Hospital. AJTMBR [Internet]. 2020 Nov. 3 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];1(3):39-42. Available from: